Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Archive for October, 2017

 

The Remnant Newspaper has once again managed to give us an excellent example of pseudo-traditionalist foolishness. In their latest anti-sede article, Michael Matt writes a blasphemous introduction for a John Salza piece titled “Raymond Cardinal Burke: New Apologist for the Sedevacantists?”

His blasphemy consists in asserting that the “New Mass is a disastrous novelty”, a “devastating sacrilege”, and “Satan’s masterstroke!”

The Council of Trent anathematizes anyone who says the ceremonies, vestments, and outward signs, which the Catholic Church uses in the celebration of Masses, are incentives to impiety rather than the services of piety (Can. 7, sess. XXII).

Since Matt believes the Catholic Church gave us the New Mass [if it wasn’t the Catholic Church, what church was it?], he must also conclude that the Catholic Church is led by Satan in giving us a sacrilegious liturgy.

Matt argues that another one of Satan’s masterstrokes is the fact that Francis is the true pope and the root cause for the crisis in the Church. Matt’s blasphemies are as bad as anything his pope has ever said.

Matt even suggests that his pope Francis hasn’t “officially and unequivocally” denied any dogma in Amoris Laetitia. Yet, his comrade Christopher Ferrara signed the “Filial Correction concerning the propagation of heresies.”

In the same article, Salza writes about the “Correction” as perhaps not being heretical but of “lessor (sic) errors on the scale of theological censures.” I’d be surprised if the signers of the document agree, especially the co-author of his book True or False Pope, Robert Siscoe, who also signed the Correction.

Salza’s main focus in the article is on how a pope loses office. Once again, he brings up the old argument about the formal and material elements of heresy, which as been refuted over and over again. Examples: A Note to John Salza: Heresy ‘Does’ Automatically Sever One from the Church

The Sin of Heresy –  Why John Salza and Robert Siscoe Get It Wrong (Part II)

Salza writes: As we explain in detail in True or False Pope?, if a Pope has not openly left the Church, or publicly admitted that he knowingly rejects what the Church definitively teaches on faith or morals (which none of the conciliar Popes have done), pertinacity would need to be established another way.  The other way, according to Divine law and canon law, is by issuing an ecclesiastical warning to the suspect.

But this is just poppycock. Let’s review:

1. Francis has openly left the Church by heresy. That’s how it works.

2. There is no divine or canon law that says the pope must be issued an ecclesiastical warning to establish pertinacity. Ecclesiastical warnings concern the penal code. [1] Popes and cardinals don’t fall under the penal code and canon law is clear that it is the superior who issues warnings [as seen in the footnote]. Popes don’t fall under the penal code because…

3. The first or primatial see is subject to no ones judgment, canon 1556. The Pope has God alone as his superior.

Salza is full of nonsense.

The experts have told us specifically how a pope relinquishes his office. See Canon 188.4 and Defection of Faith – Why John Salza and Robert Siscoe Get It Wrong (Part III)

Salza concludes: We also affirm with them that a Pope would lose his office for ‘formally professing heresy,’ only if it is according to the judgment of the Church, and certainly not according to the judgment of private individuals. This is not only the teaching of the Church and all her theologians, but common sense – a natural virtue that is often missing among those who have been so scandalized by the crisis.”

Salza still doesn’t understand what formally professing heresy means even when the Church authorities tell him. The Vatican 2 popes have consistently and repeatedly taught heresy after heresy but according to Salza, they aren’t really heretics until they are warned by cardinals who agree with those very heresies, and who have no authority to warn a Pope anyway.

In fact, Salza, Matt, etc., believe the pope can believe, teach, and promote any and every heresy under the sun and he will continue to be pope until “the church” says, “hey, we’re warning you, you’re teaching heresy” and then declares he’s not the Pope. As though the Pope were obliged to listen to what the cardinals tell him!

Sedevacantists simply understand that Francis isn’t Pope because he doesn’t have a Catholic bone in his body. I submit that the real masterstroke of Satan is the counterfeit Catholic Church and how the likes of Michael Matt and John Salza keep defending it with utter foolishness.

 

Footnote:

[1] “When does contumacy exist? The Code, can. 2242, §2, distinguishes between a censure ferendae and a censure latae sententia. The former requires a canonical admonition. Hence the ecclesiastical superior must, according to can. 2143, issue a formal warning…” (Rev. Augustine, A Commentary on the New Code of Law, The Penal Code, book V, p. 117)

Advertisements

Read Full Post »

According to Lucia, the message of Our Lady:

“When you shall see a night illuminated by an unknown light, know that it is the great sign that God gives you that He is going to punish the world for its crimes by means of war, of hunger, and of persecution of the Church and of the Holy Father.

“To prevent this I come to ask the consecration of Russia to my Immaculate Heart and the Communion of reparation on the first Saturdays. If they listen to my requests, Russia will be converted and there will be peace. If not she will scatter her errors through the world, provoking wars and persecutions of the Church. The good will be martyrized, the Holy Father will have much to suffer, various nations will be annihilated. 6 [Footnote from Walsh’s book states: Explaining this to me in July, 1946, Sister Maria das Dores (Lucia) made the prophecy even more specific, saying that Our Lady desired that Russia (not “the world” as in many inaccurate accounts) be consecrated to her Immaculate Heart by the Pope and all the bishops in the world on one special day. If not, every country in the world without exception will be chastised “by the errors of Russia.”]

“In the end my Immaculate Heart will triumph. The Holy Father will consecrate Russia to me, and a certain period of peace will be granted to the world.

“In Portugal the dogma of the Faith will always be kept.” [Our Lady of Fatima, MacMillion, First Edition 1947, p. 83, by William Thomas Walsh.]

William Thomas Walsh continued on p. 226 with a conversation with Lucia:

Sister Lucia stated, “What Our Lady wants is that the Pope and all the bishops in the world shall consecrate Russia to her Immaculate Heart on one special day. If this is done, she will convert Russia and there will peace. If it is not done, the errors of Russia will spread through every country in the world.”

“Does this mean, in your opinion, that every country, without exception, will be overcome by Communism?”

“Yes.”

A Summary of Facts:

1. The errors of Russia Our Lady was referring to was Communism.

2. The Church did suffer from wars and persecutions from Communism.

3. The good were martyred in Russia.

4. Pope Pius XII most certainly suffered.

5. Communism did spread to several countries, but not throughout the whole world.

6. Some countries were annihilated by Communism such as Ukraine, Belarus, Lithuania, Estonia, and ten other nations.

7. Our Lady said the Holy Father WILL consecrate Russia but didn’t say that he would do it with all the Bishops on one special day as She wished.

8. Pope Pius XII specifically consecrates Russia to the Immaculate Heart on July 7, 1952. http://www.1260.org/Mary/Vatican/Vatican_Pius_XII_Consecration_1952-07-07_en.htm

9. Absolute peace was never promised but a certain period of peace was granted when the dozen or so nations regained their sovereignty.

10. The Immaculate Heart of Mary always triumphs!

Read Full Post »

The Three Children Seers of Fatima

 

[The following writing is taken from my book, The Greatest Conspiracy Ever.]

It was the story of Fatima that inspired me to become a greater and more devoted Catholic. It entails the great miracle of the sun with a completely soaked countryside dried up in 10 minutes witnessed by 70,000 people whose wet and washed out clothing became as they were pressed and dried during the event. [The hundred year anniversary is just 3 days away.] The three children seers endured great penances (some of them self-inflicted) because of their vision of hell and Our Lady’s messages. It has been documented photographically that the youngest seer, Jacinta Marto, had an incorruptible body 30 years after her death. Lastly, there is the mystery of the three secrets especially the Third Secret that has kept us in suspense.

There are several books and movies about Fatima and even whole apostolates founded, dedicated and devoted to the story of Fatima. What else could be said about Fatima and the Third Secret that has not already been said? It would seem the topic has been exhausted. However, there is one more very important point about Fatima and the Third Secret, which, I believe, has been missed by everybody…Our Lady’s hidden message.

To find this hidden message, one must ask several questions which apparently have never been asked before based on the following information:

Sister Maria das Dores (Lucia de Santos), the oldest seer, once told Father Augustin Fuentes on December 26, 1957, “Father, the Blessed Virgin is very sad because no one heeds her message; neither the good nor the bad. The good continue on with their life of virtue and apostolate, but they do not unite their lives to the message of Fatima. Sinners keep following the road of evil because they do not see the terrible chastisement about to befall them. Believe me, Father, God is going to punish the world and very soon. The chastisement of heaven is imminent. In less than two years, 1960 will be here and the chastisement of heaven will come and it will be very great. Tell souls to fear not only the material punishment that will befall us if we do not pray and do penance but most of all the souls who will go to hell.” (1)

She clearly forewarned of a very great chastisement and it would occur within the next two years.

So what was it?  What very great chastisement befell the world between the years 1958 and 1960?

Was Sister Lucia a false prophet?

Sister Lucia at approximately 40 years of age 

 

From Our Lady, Lucia clearly prophesied the Spanish Civil War under Pope Pius XI and World War II under Pope Pius XII which the world experience just 13 years earlier.

Are we not to suppose that a greater chastisement will befall the world?

The Third Secret, written down by Sister Lucia in 1939, was given to the popes down through the years and was supposed to be revealed by 1960 or after Sister Lucia’s death, which ever happened first, because the world would better understand its contents in that time period. (2)

We know the Third Secret was not revealed by 1960.  I say by 1960 since Sister Lucia was apparently not dead yet, which brings us to ask the questions:

Why did Our Lady say the secret was to be revealed in 1960 or Lucia’s death whichever comes first?

Did Our Lady know that Lucia would die around the year 1960?

If not, why bring up her death at all if 1960 was the time the world would understand the Secret?

All this is very interesting because pictures of the Lucia before 1960 appear to show a different person than the Lucia after that year. Did she die and it was kept hidden from public knowledge as an imposter played her role?

Be that as it may, some other important questions need to be asked:

Since Our Lady foreknew the chastisements of the wars in the 1930’s and 1940’s, how is it she didn’t foresee her Third Secret not being revealed in 1960?

Why did Our Lady say the secret was to be revealed by 1960 if She knew that it wouldn’t happen?

If She did foresee that it wouldn’t be revealed, why did She say that it would be best understood in 1960?

Thus from these questions, we will be able to ascertain a hidden message within Sister Lucia’s prophecy to Fr. Augustin Fuentes and what Our Lady said about the reading of the Third Secret in 1960. 

Before we look at what is this hidden message, we need to hear what was said about the Third Secret from a key figure of the Church… Fr. Malachi Martin.

 

Father Malachi Martin

 

The late Fr. Malachi Martin, doctor, exorcist, linguist, and advisor to several “popes”, and made secret cardinal and bishop by Pope Pius XII, read the Third Secret in 1960 along with Cardinal Bea and John XXIII.

According to Fr. Malachi Malachi, John XXIII did not believe in Fatima and therefore refused to read the Secret because it was not in line with what John XXIII had in mind for the future of the Church. (3) In 1962, at the Second Vatican Council, John XXIII referred to the three seers of Fatima as “Prophets of Doom.”(4) This is interesting since John XXIII called Fatima, “the center of all Christian hopes.”(5) Yet, he refused to read the Third Secret in 1960.

Fr Malachi Martin gave clues to the Third Secret saying the Secret was far worse than even a nuclear war. It would fill confessionals and Churches and it did not involve the chastisements as the earlier wars. (6)

Before Fr. Malachi Martin died, he actually revealed the Third Secret to close friends and began a tell-all book on the New Vatican. With great sadness, he came to hold the sede vacant position after visiting Rome and being told by John Paul II that they did not share the same Faith. (7)

Eleven months after the death of Fr. Malachi Martin, Rome reveals what they say is the contents of the Third Secret, claiming it was about John Paul II and the attempt on his life in 1981. (8)

Since the world was told that it would better understand the meaning of the Third Secret in 1960, we know what Rome revealed in 2000 and their conclusion was a complete fabrication concocted to deflect the real Secret and its meaning.

What modernist Rome revealed was not shocking, would not fill any confessional as it didn’t, nor would there be any reason for John XXIII not to reveal what Rome actually revealed 40 years later, not to mention the fact that it was conveniently revealed after the death of Fr. Malachi Martin, the one man who could have and would have refuted their lie.

With this information, lets again look at the initial questions:

1. Since Our Lady foreknew the chastisements of the wars, how is it she didn’t foresee her Third Secret not being revealed in and by 1960?

Answer: She was fully aware that it would not be revealed and there is no reason to believe She didn’t know.

2. Why did Our Lady say that the secret was to be revealed by 1960 if She knew that it would not be done after saying the secret would be best understood by 1960?

Answer: This is the crux of the issue.  Pope Pius XII had already stated that after him would come the deluge. (9) The 1958 conclave elects a documented modernist and Mason.

So Our Lady is pointing to the time. She already said a Great Chastisement would come between the years of 1958 and 1960. Fr. Malachi said it was not about a war as with earlier chastisements but far worse.

What is far worse than a nuclear war? What happened between the years of 1958 to 1960?

I submit the death of Pope Pius XII and the uncanonically elected Roncalli to the papacy was it.

What is the worst thing that could ever happen to the world? Would it not be what sedevancantists hold to be true? That the papacy has been usurped and the true faith was replaced by a counterfeit version, with millions of Catholics being led astray right into hell? Was not hell and saving souls what Fatima was all about?

The Third Secret did not specifically say anything about the conclave or an election of some antipope or Fr Malachi Martin would have become a sedevacantist immediately, but rather it indicated an apostasy from the top and the coming antichrist, which would initiate the Great Apostasy. How far at the top? If the very top (the pope) were actually an apostate, then he would not be a true pope. It is that simple.

Not revealing the Third Secret was in essence revealing it. It is the message but a hidden message, yet everybody seemed to miss that Our Lady would know that the Secret would not be revealed in 1960 saying it would better understood then. She was telling us what it is by not having it revealed.

If you don’t believe in the approved apparition of Fatima with a verifiable miracle witnessed by over 70,000 people, then you would be viewed by the faithful as faithless. Not revealing a Secret by the Blessed Virgin Mary when asked by her to do so, is saying to all the faithful that you simply don’t trust them to believe the Catholic Faith as it has always been preached. A true pope would not try to usurp the authority of Heaven and this is precisely what John XXIII did.

The truly faithful believe in Fatima because they know the miracles that have come from it could not possibly come from hell or else the Catholic Church already defected by approving it. Remember, the Church was fully aware of the contents of the Secret when She approved the apparition.

John XXIII claimed Fatima was the center of all hope and yet refused to reveal the Secret. Why?  Was he truly faithless, a wicked man, or both?

One more thing as a little side note…Pope Pius XII consecrated specifically Russia to the Immaculate Heart of Mary on July 7, 1952, fulfilling Our Lady’s promise. She never promised he would do it with all the bishops but that he would do it none-the-less. (10)

Consequently, Russia converted out of its Communist ways ending the persecution on her Christians and there was a certain period of peace. The nations that were annihilated into the Soviet Union have regained their sovereignty. (11)

 

Footnotes:

  1. Controversy has surrounded this interview with Fr. Augustin Fuentes. Two years later, an anonymous note came from the episcopal curia of Coimbra denouncing the interview as fraudulent. Sr. Lucy was then silenced. Fr. Joaquin Alonso, who wrote over 5,000 documents on Fatima at the request of the bishop of Fatima, wrote in 1975 that the interview with Fr Augustine Fuentes was authentic.
  2. Our Lady of Fatima, MacMillion, First Edition 1947, p. 211, by William Thomas Walsh, and Sermon, Third Secret of Fatima, Most Reverend Robert F. McKenna O.P.
  3. Coast to Coast AM radio program, May 8, 1998, Art Bell with Fr Malachi Martin
  4. Fr Malachi Martin referred to the opening speech at the Second Vatican Council in the 1998 interview with Art Bell.
  5. Fatima, The Great Sign, Tan, p. 12, by Francis Johnston
  6. Coast to Coast AM radio program, May 8, 1998, Art Bell with Fr Malachi Martin
  7. Private exchanges with his closest friends.
  8. Inside the Vatican, Special Supplement June-July 2000, and Inside the Vatican June-July 2000
  9. The Destruction of Christian Tradition, World Wisdom, p. 132, by Rama P. Coomaraswamy
  10. Fatima, The Great Sign, Tan, p. 89, by Francis Johnston, states that Lucia wrote after the 1952 Consecration of Russia, “I am grieved that it has not yet been carried out as Our Lady had asked. Patience! … Let us hope that Our Lady, as a good Mother, will be pleased to accept it.” The initial quote in 1917 stated by Our Lady, “In the end, …The Holy Father will consecrate Russia to me; it will be converted.”
  11. Our Lady of Fatima, MacMillion, First Edition 1947, p. 226, by William Thomas Walsh, indicates the conversion of Russia referred by Our Lady was conversion out of Communism since this is the error that needed to be corrected by the papal consecration before it spreads to every nation.

 

Read Full Post »

Angelo Giuseppe Roncalli

 

His election was predicted ahead of time by Dr. Elisabeth Gerstner, Vatican insider, who personally knew Roncalli and the dealings inside the Vatican. “There was, however, a German journalist, Elisabeth Ger­stner, who smelled the truth in the air and, risking accusations of insanity, wrote it and hit the mark. In an article titled “Zur Todesstunde Pius XII” appeared on the “General Anzeiger fùr den Nieder-Rhein” by mid-October 1958, Gerstner wrote in detail, that the Conclave would elect Venice’s patriarch Roncalli, who would open the door to the future Paul VI (4).” Reference : Nikita Roncalli by Franco Bellegrandi published in Italian in 1994 A.D.

Roncalli in 1958 took the name of John XXIII, the same name as the Anti-Pope Baldasar Cossa who incidentally, reigned for 5 years, called for and opened the council of Constance during his 4th year, and died just before the 3rd session just as Roncalli did with his “pontificate” and Second Vatican Council.

After his death, the Vatican sent for Gennar Goglia, who with his colleagues embalmed John XXIII. Goglia injected ten liters of embalming fluid into John XXIII’s wrist and stomach to neutralize any putrefaction. This explains his incorruptible body not to mention he was found face down in his casket as reported.

Keep in mind that John Paul II beatified the man you’re about to read about. Francis I canonized him. Associations with Communists, Marxists, and terrorists would disqualify a man from the FBI and CIA of the USA. John XXIII’s friends and comrades were these very men, yet not only is he defended as a pope of the Catholic Church, but he is revered as a saint.

 

Some highlights of his modernist associations and statements:

-Was influenced by the excommunicated modernist Loisy and by modernist writer Duschene. (The Destruction of the Christian Tradition, updated and revised, 2006, Rama P. Coomaraswamy  p. 134)

-Was involved in the youth organization “Opera Dei Congress” that was dissolved by Pope St. Pius X for modernism. (The Destruction of the Christian Tradition, updated and revised, 2006, Rama P. Coomaraswamy  p. 134)

-Was associated with notorious modernists such as Bishop Radini Tedeschi, Bishop Carlo Ferrara of Milan, Bishop Bonomello of Cremona, and Lamberdo Beauduin. (The Destruction of the Christian Tradition, updated and revised, 2006, Rama P. Coomaraswamy  p. 134 cited Giancarlo Zizola’s, The Utopia of Pope John XXIII (Orbis: N.Y., 1978)

-His closest seminary friends including roommate (later Bishop of Bergamo) who assisted at his ordination were excommunicated for modernism. (The Destruction of the Christian Tradition, updated and revised, 2006, Rama P. Coomaraswamy  p. 134 cited E. Poulat (Integrisme et Catholicisme integral)

-Was a Professor of Patristics at the Lateran University, and removed several months “on suspicion of modernism” and for teaching the theories of Rudolf Steiner, an illuminati member and originator of “The Science of the Spirit known as Anthroposophy.” A file dated to 1925, the Holy Office had maintained a dossier on Angelo Roncalli which read “suspected of Modernism.”

-Roncalli continued a close association with the defrocked priest, Ernesto Buonaiuti, who was excommunicated for heresy in 1926. (Lawrence Elliott, I Will Be Called John, 1973, pp. 90-92)

-When Roncalli was Nuncio to France, he was appointed Observer for the Holy See to the United Nations cultural agency, UNESCO. In July 1951, he gave a speech “lavishly praising UNESCO…” Roncalli called UNESCO “this great international organization…” (Alden Hatch, A Man Named John, p. 117 -118)

-During his Nunciature in Paris, “Cardinal Roncalli attended in civilian clothes the Great Lodge where he found again the Jesuit Riquet. His adviser was Maurice Bredet, author of ‘Mystic and Magic,’ who boasted that he had prophesied the Tiara to Cardinal Roncalli.” (The Hidden, But Victorious Way Of The Free-Masonry, Rev. Fr. Henri Mouraux)

– “When necessary he simply contradicted previous Popes. He rejected in toto Gregory XVI’s Mirari Vos and Singulari Nos, and the Quanta Cura of Pius IX, to which was attached, as appendix, The Syllabus of Errors. John was ruthless in dismissing the views of his predecessors.” When asked about following in the footsteps of so great a man as Pius XII, John XXIII responded, “I try to imagine what my predecessor would have done, and then I do just the opposite.”(‘Pope John XXIII’ Catholic Writer Paul Johnson)

-Again Johnson, “If we take Mater et Magistra and Pacem in Terris together, they effectively demolish most of the internationalist, social, economic, and political teachings of the Popes for the previous hundred years with the one exception of Leo XIII’s Rerum Novarum.”

-Was greatly influenced by super modernist heretic Teilhard de Chardin.

-Greatly admired super modernist Maritain. (Giancarlo Zizola’s, The Utopia of Pope John XXIII, Orbis: N.Y., 1978)

-Calls on a Council and invites everybody, Protestants, Eastern Orthodox and Communists. He thought up the event 2 days from his election.

-Revolutionized the mass in 1962 and eliminated many traditional prayers such as the St. Michael Prayer of Pope Leo from the low masses.

-He refused to read the 3rd Secret of Fatima and called the Fatima seers “Prophets of Doom.” (Malachi Martin)

-Removed the Patron Saint of St. John Vianney off the Calendar, St. Philomena. (Pope Gregory XVI had given her the titles of: “Great Wonder Worker of the 19th century” and “Patroness of the Living Rosary, and then canonized her in 1837.) He, also, removed other great saints.

 

Some highlights involving associations with enemies of the Church:

-When elevated to the College of Cardinals, Roncalli insisted upon receiving the red hat from the notoriously anti-clerical Vincent Auriol, President of the Masonic “Fourth Republic” of France, kneeling before him to have the red hat placed upon his head.  John XXIII said of Vincent Auriol that he was “an honest socialist.” (Alden Hatch, A Man Named John, p. 121)

-John XXIII was also known as a “good friend and confidant” of Edouard Herriot, Secretary of the Anti-Catholic Radical Socialists (of France). “Perhaps Roncalli’s greatest friend was the grand old socialist and anti-clerical, Edouard Herriot.” (Rev. Francis Murphy, John XXIII Comes To The Vatican, 1959, p. 139. Alden Hatch, A Man Named John, p. 114)

-One of John XXIII’s good friends was the Communist and Lenin Peace Prize winner Giacomo Manzu. (Curtis Bill Pepper, An Artist and the Pope, London, England: Grosset & Dunlap, Inc. Front cover & inside slip cover of book; also look at p. 5)

-John XXIII said: “I see no reason why a Christian could not vote for a Marxist if he finds the latter to be more fit to follow such a political line and historical destiny.” (Fr. Joaquin Saenz Y Arriaga, The New Montinian Church, Brea, Ca., p. 570)

– At social functions in Paris Roncalli was frequently seen fraternizing with the Soviet Ambassador, M. Bogomolov, even though the Soviet Union had resumed its pre-war policy of brutal extermination of Catholics in Russia. Also a good friend of Edouard Herriot, Secretary of the anti-Catholic Radical Socialists (of France) (John XXIII Comes To The Vatican, by Rev. Francis X. Murphy, C.SS.R., 1959, p. 139)

 

Some highlights involving Freemasonry:

-Cardinal Angelo Roncalli was a documented Freemason seated next to Edouard Herriot, Secretary of the Radical Socialists whom Roncalli hosted, along with other officials of the Masonic “Fourth Republic” of France, in 1953

-Was Papal Nuncio in Paris and would visit the Grand Lodge of that city in civilian clothes every Thursday evening as testified by several members of the French police appointed to guard him. (This information can be substantiated by Commandant Rouchette, the retired French police at B.P. 151, 18105 Cognac Cedex. France. Also noted in Mary Ball Martinez, The Undermining of the Catholic Church, Hillmac, Mexico, 1999, p. 117)

-Yves Marsaudon, 33rd degree Scottish Rite Freemason: “The sense of universalism that is rampant in Rome these days is very close to our purpose for existence… with all our hearts we support the revolution of John XXIII.” (Yves Marsaudon in his book Ecumenism Viewed by a Traditional Freemason, Paris: Ed. Vitiano; quoted by Dr. Rama Coomaraswamy, The Destruction of the Christian Tradition, p. 144.)

-Yves Marsaudon, the aforementioned French Freemason and author, also claims that Roncalli [John XXIII] became a thirty-third degree Mason while a nuncio at France.

-The Grand Master of the Grand Orient of Italy of Italian Freemasonry told 30 Days Magazine: “As for that, it seems that John XXIII was initiated (into a Masonic Lodge) in Paris and participated in the work of the Istanbul Workshops.” (Giovanni Cubeddu, 30 Days, Issue No. 2-1994 p. 25)

-From 30 Days magazine, Nov. 2, 1994 edition entitled “A John XXIII Update”: “Our readers will remember that in our June 1994 newsletter (Nuclear Horizons) we published a sensational statement by the Grand Master of the Italian Grand Orient Order of Freemasons to the effect that ‘Pope’ John XXIII had been initiated into the Freemasons when he was Nuncio in Paris in the late forties. We pointed out, that if this statement were true, Angelo Roncalli (John XXIII) could not possibly have been validly elected to the Supreme Pontificate. He would have been intrinsically ineligible by reason of his automatic excommunication under Canon Law (No. 2335). Not being a Catholic, it was not possible for him to be head of the Catholic Church.”

-When Angelo Roncalli was the nuncio to France, he appointed a thirty-third degree Freemason and close friend, the Baron Yves Marsaudon, as head of the French branch of the Knights of Malta, a Catholic lay order, causing a major scandal for the Pius XII papacy. (Paul I. Murphy and R. Rene Arlington, La Popessa, 1983, pp. 332-333)

– “If there are still some remnants of thought, reminiscent of the Inquisition, they will be drowned in a rising flood of ecumenism and liberalism. One of the most tangible consequences will be the lowering of spiritual barriers that divide the world. With all our hearts we wish for the success of John XXIII’s Revolution.” (L’oecumenisme vu par un Franc Macon de Tradition, Yves Marsaudon, 1964, Paris, p. 26)

-The dedication and preface for Marsaudon’s book was written by Charles Riandley, Sovereign Grand Commander of the Supreme Council of France (Scottish Rite). Riandley wrote: “To the memory of Angelo Roncalli,… Pope under the Name of John XXIII, Who Has Deigned to Give Us His Benediction, His Understanding and His Protection,… [and] To His August Continuer, His Holiness Pope Paul VI.” Riandley confidently predicted how the policies of Roncalli and Montini would advance the Masonic agenda: “We are convinced of the narrowness of the spiritual, cultural, scientific, social and economic structures which up to our own time, have hindered the actions and the thoughts of man… But these structures have already been shattered in part. Some pontifical decisions have contributed to this. We feel sure that they will be all destroyed eventually… True, not everything is to be rejected; but what cannot be saved will not be saved unless it is renovated.” (L’oecumenisme vu par un Franc Macon de Tradition, Yves Marsaudon, 1964, Paris, pp. 15, 16)

-John XXIII wrote a Masonic type of encyclical Pacem et Terris and was praised by General Secretary of the British Communist Party, John Gollan, before television cameras on April 21, 1963, said the “encyclical (Pacem in Terris) [of John XXIII] had surprised and gladdened” him and, therefore, he had externalized his “most sincere satisfaction at the recent 28th Party Congress.” (Fr. Joaquin Saenz Y Arriaga, The New Montinian Church, Brea, CA., p. 170)

-John XXIII, Pacem in terris #14, April 11, 1963: “Also among man’s rights is that of being able to worship God in accordance with the right dictates of his own conscience, and to profess his religion both in private and in public.”

-When the theologian of the Holy Office, Fr. Ciappi, told John XXIII that his encyclical Pacem in Terris contradicted the teaching of Popes Gregory XVI and Pius IX on religious liberty, John XXIII responded: “I won’t be offended by a few spots if most of it shines.” (Catholic Restoration, March-April 1992, Madison Heights, MI, p. 29)

-The Masonic Bulletin, the official organ of the Supreme Council of the 33rd Degree of the Ancient and Accepted Scottish Rite of Masons, for the Masonic District of the United States of Mexico, located at 56 Lucerna St., Mexico, D.F. (Year 18, No. 220, May 1963):

“THE LIGHT OF THE GREAT ARCHITECT OF THE UNIVERSE ENLIGHTENS THE VATICAN

“Generally speaking, the encyclical Pacem in Terris, addressed to all men of goodwill, has inspired comfort and hope. Both in democratic and Communist countries it has been universally praised. Only the Catholic dictatorships have frowned upon it and distorted its spirit. “To us many concepts and doctrines it contains are familiar. We have heard them from illustrious rationalist, liberal, and socialist brothers. After having carefully weighed the meaning of each word, we might say that, the proverbial and typical Vatican literary rubbish notwithstanding, the encyclical Pacem in Terris is a vigorous statement of Masonic doctrine… we do not hesitate to recommend its thoughtful reading.” (Fr. Joaquin Saenz Y Arriaga, The New Montinian Church, pp. 147-148)

– “The direction of our action: Continuation of the Work of John XXIII and all those who have followed him on the way to Templar Universalism.” (Resurgence du Temple, published and edited by the Knights Templar (Freemasons), 1975   A.D.O. Datus, “Ab Initio,” p. 60)

-From the June 4, 1963, edition of The Reporter (El Informador):

“The Great Western Mexican Lodge of Free and Accepted Masons, on the occasion of the death of John XXIII, makes known its sorrow for the disappearance of this great man who revolutionized the ideas, thoughts, and forms of the Roman Catholic liturgy. His encyclicals Mater et Magistra and Pacem in Terris have revolutionized the concepts favoring human rights and liberty. Mankind has lost a great man, and we Masons acknowledge his high principles, his humanitarianism, and his being a great liberal. Guadalajara, Jal., Mexico, June 3, 1963 Dr. Jose Guadalupe Zuno Hernandez” (Fr. Joaquin Saenz Y Arriaga, The New Montinian Church, p. 147)

-Charles Riandey, a sovereign Grand Master of secret societies, in his preface to a book by Yves Marsaudon (State Minister of the Supreme Council of French secret societies), stated: “To the memory of Angelo Roncalli, priest, Archbishop of Messamaris, Apostolic Nuncio in Paris, Cardinal of the Roman Church, Patriarch of Venice, Pope under the name of John XXIII, who has deigned to give us his benediction, his understanding, and his protection.” (Piers Compton, The Broken Cross, Cranbrook, Western Australia: Veritas Pub. Co. Ptd Ltd, 1984, p. 50)

– “I know Cardinal Roncalli very well. He was a Deist and a Rationalist whose strength did not lie in the ability to believe in miracles and to venerate the sacred.” (Journal de Geneve, by Freemason Carl Jacob Burckhardt, A.D.O Datus, “AB INITIO,” p. 60)

-John XXIII made a notorious Freemason, Umberto Ortolani, a “Gentleman of His Holiness.”

-Cardinal Heenan, who was present at the 1958 conclave which gave us John XXIII, once mentioned: “There was no great mystery about Pope John’s election. He was chosen because he was a very old man. His chief duty was to make Msgr. Montini (later Paul VI), the Archbishop of Milan, a cardinal so that he could be elected in the next conclave. That was the policy and it was carried out precisely.” (Cardinal Heenan’s biography, Crown of Thorns)

After 1958 conclave, he summoned the conclavists back for an unusual overnight post-election session: “John XXIII asked the cardinals to remain in the conclave another night instead of leaving immediately as was customary…to caution them again against revealing the secrets of his election to outsiders…” (Alden Hatch, A Man Named John, Hawthorn Books, 1963, p. 163)

“After greeting and blessing the cheering throng in St. Peter’s Square . . . John XXIII ordered the Cardinals not to disperse. He wished to meet with them in secret. This was a burden on several of the Cardinals who were in their nineties and in failing health, but in deference to the new Pope they all stayed. It must have been a very sensitive meeting, for when Secretary of State Tardini tried to enter, mistakenly believing the conclave was over, he was promptly excommunicated by France’s Cardinal Tisserant.” (Mark Fellows, Fatima in Twilight, p. 154)

In October 1958, the greatest conspiracy ever is made manifest. The Freemasonic plan is finally realized when one of their own is recognized as the visible head of the Catholic Church.

 

Apparition of John XXIII

 

In 1963, two coal miners trapped in a collapsed mine in Central Pennsylvania claimed to see an apparition or vision of John XXIII who had recently died. They testified that John XXIII was wearing a black cassock “like that of a poor parish priest.” He was not dressed as the pope.

 

 

Read Full Post »